With intense brown eyes, a biker-style mustache, a raspy voice, and a physique resembling that of an NFL defensive end, Freddy Escobar has established a formidable presence in the political landscape of Los Angeles as the leader of the city’s firefighters union. He confronted me head-on during a Rick Caruso campaign event in 2022, expressing his dissatisfaction with what he perceived as my excessively negative reporting on the mega-developer’s bid for mayor. Most recently, Escobar criticized Mayor Karen Bass for dismissing L.A. Fire Department Chief Kristin Crowley following the Palisades fire. “Management and labor, united. We were unbeatable,” the 55-year-old remarked during an hour-long discussion at the union’s headquarters in Westlake. “And [Crowley] was made a scapegoat. We lost a significant champion for us.” Since 2018, Escobar has been the President of the United Firefighters of Los Angeles City and is currently in his final two-year term before retirement. Throughout his career, L.A. firefighters have faced challenging times: the COVID pandemic, the Palisades inferno, and a decrease in fire stations compared to those available in 1960, when the population was considerably lower than today’s nearly 4 million. Scandals involving past union leaders have also marred the department. “Our members in the field are doing well,” Escobar responded when asked about how firefighters are coping through it all. Sitting in an armchair, with thick glasses and a long-sleeved shirt that softened his appearance, Escobar was surrounded by mementos from his 35-year firefighting career: family pictures, helmets and hats, lanyards, bottles, and even a Santa Claus figure dressed as a firefighter, along with numerous binders of reports. “You won’t hear them complain,” he said of his field colleagues — the burden of complaints rests on him. “What we do every single day is unsustainable in the field — regardless of how young you are,” Escobar expressed, his tone more weary than irate. “It’s a Band-Aid that’s been there for years. We need to address it.” Since the Palisades fire, Escobar has made numerous appearances: on CNN, surveying the damage, stating in USA Today that the LAFD is “critically and dangerously understaffed,” and attending City Hall alongside Crowley in an unsuccessful bid to have her reinstated by the City Council. “She was the first chief who truly considered our input. I told her, ‘I’ll stand by you through it all,’” he said. Freddy Escobar in his United Firefighters of Los Angeles City office. (Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times) Escobar was born in Ecuador to an Ecuadorian mother and a Colombian father, moving to Pico-Union at age 4 before relocating to Lynwood as “the gangs were moving in.” During fourth grade at Roosevelt Elementary, firefighters were called to extinguish a fire at his school. Shortly thereafter, his class made a field trip to a fire station for a career day. “You’re just a child,” Escobar recalled. “You’re in awe — these are your heroes, you know. You think, ‘Wow, these guys are larger than life.’” He engaged in a firefighting Explorers program at Downey High, then joined the LAFD after serving in the Marines. His first posting was at Station 11 in Pico-Union. Escobar became a shop steward but didn’t consider pursuing labor leadership until the early 2000s, when his fire truck was struck by drivers on two occasions. “The friends there, we refer to them as,” he explained, using a term I had not encountered for chapines — Guatemalans. Escobar remained unfazed as he began to express his thoughts resonant of former City Council president Nury Martinez, who resigned after her disparaging comments were recorded. “They love to drink all day long. They drink excessively. They get behind the wheel. So I got hit … twice by those guys.” His casual derogatory comments about an essential segment of L.A.’s community were so unexpected that I could only stare ahead and let him continue. He mentioned expressing frustration to a coworker that his union representative wasn’t adequately defending him during the investigations into the accidents, which eventually found him blameless. The coworker encouraged him, saying, “Six months later, it’s election season, and he said, ‘Hey, loud mouth. Here’s your chance. Go and make a difference.’” Escobar acted on the advice, successfully winning a place on the union’s 10-member executive board. After years of feeling trapped in “a crybaby arena” primarily focused on maintaining power rather than supporting the rank-and-file, he challenged an incumbent for the top position and triumphed. During the pandemic, the union gained national attention for refusing to endorse a mandate for city employees to be vaccinated or face job loss. Although Escobar received the COVID vaccine, he believed he needed to honor the preferences of members who opted out. That conflict, he mentioned, “drove a wedge between us politically,” but lingering internal hostilities mostly faded after contending with the Palisades fire. Escobar’s eyes glimmered when I brought up his warning a month prior to the fire, stating “someone will die” if LAFD resources were further diminished. The Palisades fire, which ignited on January 7 following dire predictions of extreme winds, ravaged nearly 7,000 structures and claimed 12 lives. A Times investigation revealed that LAFD officials opted not to order around 1,000 firefighters to stay on duty for an additional shift as winds escalated — a decision that would have doubled the available personnel. Bass pointed to the failure to retain those firefighters on duty as one reason she dismissed Crowley. Escobar dismissed The Times’ findings as overly dependent on former LAFD personnel “who have their own agendas.” He didn’t directly respond to my inquiry about whether Crowley did everything within her power, maintaining that she was made a scapegoat without a formal investigation. He contended instead that the Palisades disaster could have been better managed if the LAFD had sufficient funding — he aims to propose a bond measure for the Fire Department in the 2026 ballot. Freddy Escobar speaks at a news conference in February 2025 following the dismissal of Los Angeles Fire Chief Kristin Crowley by Mayor Karen Bass. (Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times) He refrained from speculating on why Bass let Crowley go, especially after Crowley publicly criticized the mayor just days after the Palisades fire commenced for allegedly underfunding her department. He indicated that the two were once “inseparable,” adding, “Bass donned Crowley’s brush jacket and helmet and all the firefighting gear. They were joined at the hip, and then had one minor falling out. Picture if you were married — have one breakup, and you’re getting divorced?” He expressed no regrets about his outspoken public demeanor: “If they want to label it abrasive or bullying, I prefer to think of it as standing up for what’s right.” Then our discussion shifted to the topic of diversity within the LAFD. Earlier, Escobar acknowledged that he had gained from a consent decree established in 1974 mandating that half of LAFD hires be from minority groups (which ended in 2002). Now, he criticized the fire commission — the civilian board overseeing the LAFD — for supposedly aiming to create a “no-fail academy” to reflect the demographics of the city. “We have ample people of color and diverse genders that could — should — represent Los Angeles without compromising standards,” Escobar remarked. “We would love to have all the women in the fire service. However, if you’re a woman seeking this career, you might prefer to work in Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, or Huntington Beach, where the call load is lighter.” He believes that white and Black firefighters are “overrepresented, whatever that means” within LAFD, with whites benefitting from what was once “an all-white department” and the numbers of Black firefighters mirroring “the demographic makeup of the community.” Whites constitute 28% of L.A.’s population and 43% of city firefighters, while Blacks make up 9% of the population and 11% of firefighters. The LAFD comprises only 7% of women. The other significant disparity is with Latinos — they represent 47% of the population but only 31% of LAFD personnel. “It’s not a fit for everyone,” Escobar remarked before jokingly stating, “They all aspire to be soccer players!” Earlier, he mentioned that he failed a tryout with the L.A. Galaxy because “I wasn’t a professional soccer player. The same applies to firefighting; it isn’t for just anyone.” I chuckled at his jest but reminded him of his own journey. He responded that LAFD has “solid” recruitment initiatives, but ultimately “you need to enjoy hands-on work…. The new generation is intriguing. They seek to be Instagram-famous, aiming for high salaries without putting in the effort.” Escobar displayed vulnerability at times during our discussion, admitting that it “breaks his heart” to realize he hasn’t been more involved in his family’s life. He feels he has “failed” by not advocating for more resources. However, his ambiguous explanation regarding the shortage of Latino firefighters in L.A., coupled with his unsavory thoughts about Guatemalans, reflects a familiar type of Angeleno I often encounter: a powerful Latino who dismisses their own kind once they achieve success. Escobar converses with the crew at Station 26, where he served nearly two decades before assuming the leadership of L.A.’s firefighters union in 2018. (Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times) We eventually arrived at one of Escobar’s former stations: Station 26, whose motto is “Anytime Anyplace,” where he ascended through the ranks to the position of captain. Station Captain Al Ballestra commended Escobar for still volunteering to cover firefighting shifts during holidays. Escobar takes on about four shifts a month, even though his role as union president is a full-time responsibility. “It’s exactly what any membership would desire from their union leader,” the 18-year veteran stated. “Someone with frontline experience who maintains that connection with us.” Escobar then observed a rookie training session in the rec room. I asked the assembled group for their impressions of their union head. Engineer Gordon Wilson raised his hand, prompting silence in the room. He listed all the layers of bureaucracy — internal, the fire commission, the City Council, the mayor — that engage with L.A. firefighters. He pointed at Escobar. “This individual right here,” Wilson declared loudly, “has an extraordinary knack for communicating with them all.” Source link
18 minutes *** This is a winter walk through Wardlow Park in Long Beach, California. It is a medium sized grassy park with a … source
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday upheld California’s ban on gun magazines that exceed a capacity of 10 bullets, reversing a previous decision by a federal judge in San Diego who deemed the law unconstitutional. This ban was challenged in a lawsuit by gun rights advocates, who argue that it infringes on the Second Amendment. In contrast, the California Attorney General’s Office contends that the law acts as a deterrent to mass shootings. In a majority opinion delivered by an en banc panel of 11 judges, Judge Susan Graber stated, “A large-capacity magazine serves little purpose in legitimate armed self-defense, but its use by mass shooters has intensified the severity of their attacks. Assailants equipped with large-capacity magazines can shoot off 20, 30, or even 100 rounds without interruption. These breaks are vital. Victims and law enforcement officers can utilize these brief moments of silence to escape, take cover, or counterattack. The use of large-capacity magazines by mass shooters severely restricts those crucial opportunities.” Three judges dissented, arguing that the ban is unconstitutional when assessed against the Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, which stated that judicial assessments of firearm regulations should align with “the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” The dissenting judges maintained that the Second Amendment safeguards the right to possess magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. This recent ruling overturns a 2023 decision from U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez, who had previously invalidated the law in 2017 and has consistently sided with gun rights proponents in other legal challenges concerning California’s firearm and ammunition laws. Chuck Michel, president and general counsel of the California Rifle & Pistol Association—one of the original lawsuit’s plaintiffs—stated on Thursday, “This flawed ruling is not unexpected given the tendency of many judges in the Ninth Circuit to improperly restrict the protections of the Second Amendment. We will seek an immediate review from the Supreme Court.” California Attorney General Rob Bonta commended Thursday’s ruling, describing the ban as “a crucial element in our efforts to combat gun violence and prevent senseless injuries and deaths, as well as the devastation experienced by communities and families in the aftermath of mass shootings.” Bonta emphasized, “This sensible restriction on the number of rounds a shooter can fire before needing to reload has been recognized as a vital measure to limit a lone assailant’s ability to carry out mass casualty events. Let me be clear: this law saves lives. Today’s ruling represents a significant victory—not just in this case, but in our broader initiatives to safeguard California communities against gun violence.” Source link
PALM SPRINGS, Calif. (KESQ) — Due to a state of emergency, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) is temporarily easing restrictions on portable generators. CARB says there’s a shortage of state-certified generators in some areas because of increased demand from wildfires. To address this, CARB announced in January, it’s allowing the sale of generators that meet U.S. EPA standards, even if they don’t meet California’s emissions rules. This temporary rule lasts until June 30, 2025. Gas-powered generators are being phased out as part of California’s plan to reduce emissions and transition to zero-emission equipment by 2028. With Thursday’s earthquake in Borrego Springs as a reminder, generators can be critical in emergencies, providing backup power during outages. BE PART OF THE CONVERSATION News Channel 3 is committed to providing a forum for civil and constructive conversation. Please keep your comments respectful and relevant. You can review our Community Guidelines by clicking here If you would like to share a story idea, please submit it here. Source link
Nurses picket in Long Beach, California, March 19, 2025. On Tuesday, nearly 2,200 nurses at MemorialCare Long Beach Medical Center protested the inhumane conditions that have become the norm in hospitals across the United States. Holding an informational picket, these healthcare workers sought to expose the hospital administration’s callous refusal to address the ongoing crisis of understaffing, workplace violence and burnout. Their modest demands—adequate staffing and safe working conditions—are a fight for the survival of healthcare itself. Yet, they face not only an intransigent hospital administration but a union leadership and political establishment determined to suppress any genuine struggle. This struggle unfolds amid growing fascistic attacks against immigrants and democratic rights by the Trump administration. Workers face escalating crackdowns on labor rights, free speech and protests as well as the dismantlement of education. Trump’s second term signals an urgent need for all workers to organize independently against an incipient dictatorship that is resorting to police repression and legal intimidation to silence dissent. The crisis at Long Beach Medical Center is part of a broader assault on science and healthcare workers, deepened under the Trump administration’s operatives, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Mehmet Oz. Trump’s agenda is full-scale privatization, slashing public healthcare funding and gutting worker protections. Kennedy and Oz serve as frontmen, disguising the drive for deregulation under fraudulent appeals to “health freedom.” The result is hospitals run like for-profit slaughterhouses, where profit margins dictate care, patients’ lives are placed at risk and workers are pushed to exhaustion. Nurses at Long Beach Medical Center experience this firsthand. They work grueling hours under extreme stress, with dangerously low staffing ratios that endanger both them and their patients. They face increasing workplace violence, yet management refuses to implement serious protections. They are overworked, underpaid and treated as expendable by a system that prioritizes corporate profits over human lives. The California Nurses Association, under National Nurses United (CNA/NNU), has a history of sabotaging workers’ struggles. In 2022, nurses at Long Beach Medical Center waged a powerful strike against unsafe conditions, yet the CNA swiftly shut it down by calling for a vote on a sellout agreement, demobilizing nurses just as they were gaining momentum. Rather than organizing a fight to win nurses’ demands, the CNA leadership ensured the strike would end before it could threaten the hospital’s profits. Three years later, as workers’ conditions have only further deteriorated, the union offers only another toothless “informational picket,” refusing to mobilize the full strength of healthcare workers. Nurses picket in Long Beach, California, March 19, 2025. The CNA/NNU has collaborated with management, particularly at Kaiser Permanente, where it receives corporate funding through the “Labor-Management Partnership.” Union agreements have justified workforce restructuring, replacing registered nurses with lower-paid, less-trained staff via telehealth and “command center” models, creating a “generic workforce.” This increased RN’s workloads as they supervised less-experienced staff while managing patient care remotely. Tied to the Democratic Party, CNA has failed to oppose policies that weakened healthcare. California’s Democratic government neglects safe staffing laws, benefiting hospital profits, while Democratic administrations have prioritized corporate bailouts over worker protections, leaving healthcare staff struggling for better conditions. The WSWS spoke to several nurses who expressed concerns about safety. Jessica, a nurse with many years of experience in the rehab department said, “People come in from buses or trains in the middle of the night and come into our unit. Security guards don’t stop them, it’s scary. Sometimes we have to send them up to ICU. There’s staffing ratio [issues], things are severe. The social crisis has become worse.” She focused on the social crisis and working conditions: “There’s a lot of homeless[ness] and mental illness, people yelling, cursing, coming in. We haven’t had any of us physically assaulted, not yet, thank God, but it’s stuff like that.” Our reporter raised the issue of medical care becoming increasingly financialized. She replied, “Exactly! You know, when I started out in nursing, it was all about patient care. And now it’s all about numbers and documentation. There’s no direct patient care it seems like anymore.” When the reporter asked the nurse her thoughts on the Trump administration, she said, “Don’t get me going!” Another nurse, James, said, “We are fighting for better staffing. When we’re understaffed, it’s very hard to provide good patient care. At the same time, they’re cutting some of our benefits. They removed the time-and-a-half pay for working the night shift and for the graveyard shift. We used to get it for the past five to six years. “Everybody’s getting overworked. Honestly, it’s overwhelming. It’s really hard to work like that, full of stress. Sometimes, when I go home, it’s so draining. And then you have to come back the next day and do it all over again. Draining.” Nurses picket in Long Beach, California, March 19, 2025 Shelley, a nurse, also stressed the safety issue: “We need more assurances that the nurses and all the other employees are safe in the workplace. If there’s more of a chance for workplace violence, that affects the safety of all the patients, and it also depends on the nurse-to-patient ratios.” She reflected on Trump’s fascistic policies: “There’s Ukraine and its special minerals and natural resources. And then the way he talked with the Canadians, kind of like ‘Well, you don’t even have much of a military. Don’t just think we’re going to protect you just because we’re friends.’ It was like a veiled threat.” She emphasized the volatility of the international situation: “I’m thinking, do we have a World War III coming on right now? That’s where my head’s at. He’s talking all about tariffs. No, I feel like he’s just getting ready because we’re about to go off to war, for World War III.” Like most workers, Shelley is becoming increasingly politicized: “America’s stuck in this two-party system, and it’s difficult. I don’t know. I’m waiting and watching, trying not to have anxiety about it, just show up to work, do the right thing and love people. It does seem that the nurses here are waking up to the fact that they have rights, you know, that they can speak up.” When asked what she thought of the Trump administration’s gutting of federal workers’ jobs and the deportations, she replied: “Trump is firing thousands of federal workers under the narration of ‘waste and fraud.’ So you can’t just do that and not show proof. They say they’re going to show it, but are they going to show it?” About immigrant raids, Shelley offered: “They show ICE picking up the criminals, the rapists and human traffickers, and then there’s someone who says, ‘Yeah, but they went after me, and I’m not any of those things.’… They could also be picking up a mom with her sick kids.” Are you a health care worker with a story to tell? Make your voice heard! All submissions will be kept anonymous. Source link
Traveling across California! source